Dear authors!


The basis for the decision on the review article is the following:

1. the requirements for published materials;

2. providing a review of an article PhD in profile research;

3. the signing of the agreement on transfer of rights to the publication of the article;

4. the signing of permission for the publication of personal information about the author (s) of the article;

5. the provision of information about the author(s)


At all stages of the manuscript and for communication with the authors, edited uses e-mail, so the authors should be careful when indicate their e-mail.


The rules of direction, review and publication of scientific articles in the journal «Economical and humanities researches of the regions»


1. Rules of the publication of articles in the journal


1.1. The material proposed for publication must be original, unpublished in other publications. All articles are checked for plagiarism. Articles and other materials submitted to the editor by e-mail redsov@mail.ru.

1.2. The articles are reviewed in the order specified in the Regulations on reviewing.

2.2. Rules for the text as follows:

copyrighted material should be prepared to set the size of A4 paper (210h 297 mm), a semi-line spacing;

font color - black,

font size -14 pt, Times Roman.

Field sizes: right - 25 mm, left - 25 mm, top - 25 mm, bottom - 25 mm. The emphasis in the text is not desirable. All the text copyright material taken in the doc. and rtf. Corrections and additions made without the knowledge of the editorial board, will not be counted. Pages are not numbered publication, page headers are created.

2.3. Pictures. Drawings. Graphs.

Illustrations should have name; they must be given by reference in the text. The word "Figure", its serial number, name and a descriptive information directly under the picture, they should be numbered in Arabic numerals sequentially numbered. If the picture alone, he is not numbered. Text design illustrations in electronic documents: font Times New Roman, 9 pt, direct mark.

Drawings, graphs, charts, diagrams, illustrations, placed in the publication must meet the requirements of state standards of the Unified system of design documentation (ESKD). All images must be submitted as separate files of electronic documents. All objects, including formulas, should be created through appropriate integrated editor MS OFFICE and grouped.

2.4. Tables.

The tables have the name and the reference in the text. The name should reflect its contents, to be brief, placed above the table. Text design tables in electronic documents: font Times New Roman, 9 pt, font directly. The tables do not need to be in separate documents.

2.5. Notes, links and bibliographic description of sources (bibliography).

The set of endnotes bibliographic references (bibliography) is issued as a list of bibliographic records placed after the text of the document. The numbering sequentially throughout the text. To communicate with the text of the document the serial number of the bibliographic records in the endnotes link gain in square brackets in line with the text of the document, for example, [7]. If a link leads to a specific piece of text document, sending indicate the serial number and the page on which the reference object is placed, for example, [7, P.15].

  Bibliographical references (literature) prepared in accordance with GOST R 7.0.5-2008.


2.6. Tekst article is available in electronic form in a separate file in the doc. or rtf. File name - the name of the first author + "article". For example:                                    "Petrov article. rtf ». Files of illustrations and charts are available in electronic form in a single file - another illustration or chart format jpg., Tif. (For grayscale images) or ai, cdr, eps (for vector images). File name - the name of the first author + "Figure N», strictly in the order in the article. For example: "Petrov, Fig. 1.jpg» ,                                «Petrov, Fig. 2.eps».

A review or a review of the supervisor (consultant), stamped by the faculty, the university administration or the personnel department of the university, should be scanned with a resolution of 100 dpi (color image), save in a separate file in a format jpg. or pdf. . File name - the name of the first author + "REC". For example: "Petrov rets.jpg."






 UDC (Times Roman, 14, italic type)


(Times Roman, 14, bold, capital letters,



Last Name, First Name, Middle name (initials) in Russian

(Times Roman, 14, italic, bold, centered)


(Times Roman, 14, bold, capital letters,


Last Name, First Name, Middle name (initials) in English

(Times Roman, 14, italic, bold, centered)


Abstract in Russian (at least five sentences) without title «», Times Roman, 14.

Abstract in English (translation) without title «Annotation», Times Roman, 14


: (Times Roman, 14 in Russian, not less than 7)

Keywords: (Times Roman, 14, the translation of key words in the English language)

Text of the article



(In alphabetical order

(Times Roman, 14, bold, capital letters, centered)


3. Review articles


3.1. Received to the editorial board articles manuscripts are checked for compliance with design articles and accompanying documents with the requirements of the journal.

3.2. All incoming to the editors articles are kindly requested to review with a view to peer review. All reviewers are acknowledged experts on the subject of the reviewed materials and have in the past 3 years publications on the subject of peer-reviewed articles. Chief editor assigns a reviewer from among the members of the editorial board, which is recognized expert on the subject of peer-reviewed material. It applies one of two review: unilateral "blind" (the reviewer knows about the author, the author - not) or two-way "blind" (the two do not know each other).

3.3. Expert evaluation of the manuscript should be carried out according to the following criteria: compliance to the journal subjects; does the title of the article  reflects the content and  a subject of  the research; the presence of the problem description with justification relevance of its solutions; assessment of research objectives; the availability and quality description of the material, research methods, and tools used in the study justify the selection of the method of statistical processing and analysis of research materials; degree of reliability and importance the results; the availability, content and related materials research findings or conclusions; scientific innovation and practical value of the research results; presence and design of bibliographic list on the basis of the requirements stipulated by the applicable State standards; the presence of  references in the text to all literary sources are listed in the bibliography and list of references matching references in the text; the presence of information on the organization in which the work was done and complete information about all of the author.

3.4. The reviewer also evaluates the structure, content and brevity of abstracts, its conformity to the structure and content of the article, the presence of keywords.

3.5. The review may contain comments that are subject to correction by the author. Reviewers remarks sent to the author by e-mail. Author corrects notes as long as the editor does not receive a positive opinion of the reviewer. The review should include a general conclusion about the possibility of publication of the article without any corrections or after author correcting of the reviewers remarks, or the impossibility of its publication, and for what reason.  Also assessed the formal characteristics of the articles and the observance of the author (s) requirements for the articles.

3.6. The review being written in a free form. The review should include complete information about the reviewer: name, surname, patronymic, academic degree and title, position, information about the institution (name with the departmental affiliation, address, zip code, number, telephone and fax numbers with area code).

3.7. The review includes an overall conclusion about possibility of publication without any corrections or after revision by the author, reviewer, or about the impossibility of its publication and for what reason.  Also evaluated the formal characteristics of the article and respect the author (authors) of the physical requirements of the article.

3.8. The signature of the reviewer should be certified by the Academic Secretary of the Board or a trustee and printing facilities. Review on paper and in electronic form shall reviewer to the editorial board.

3.9. The editorial board post on the website of the journal editorial board decision on the adoption of the articles to be published and notify the author by e-mail. In the case of a negative conclusion of the reviewer, the article is not accepted for publication, and the author of the editorial board of the decision sent by e-mail.

3.9. Reviews of the received materials in hard copy stored in the version for 5 years. At the request of the Ministry of Education and Science of the review must be submitted to the Higher Attestation Commission and / or the Ministry.

3.10. The peer reviews of submitted manuscripts on paper are kept in the office for 5 years. Upon requests of the Ministry of education and science's review in a mandatory manner can be provided in the Highest certifying Commission and/or the Ministry of education and science of the Russian Federation.



www.cegr.ru                                                                   Copyright@ 2011.